Wilhelm II: Difference between revisions
imported>Richard Jensen (add details) |
imported>Richard Jensen m (photo) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
==World War== | ==World War== | ||
Very much sobered in the later years of his reign, and much concerned over the precariousness of Germany's position because of the weakness of the [[Triple Alliance]] (Germany, Austria, Italy) and the growing strength of the opposition Triple [[Entente]] (Britain, France, Russia), he abandoned his former methods. The question as to his guilt for World War I, which was written into the [[Treaty of Versailles]], became a subject of bitter debate after the war. During the war he repeatedly tried to interfere with the work of the German general staff, until the General Staff learned how to sideline him with endless briefings. His power was then limited to the appointment and dismissal of key personnel. His importance in the decision-making process was less a matter of his input into the decisions themselves than the people he appointed to make them. Ultimately, he acted as an "umpire," coordinating strategic planning between politicians and the military. The fact that he could delay or prevent policy measures through his veto power led people to anticipate his wishes and avoid decisions likely to meet with his disapproval.<ref>Holger Afflerbach, "Wilhelm II as Supreme Warlord in the First World War." ''War in History'' 1998 5(4): 427-449. Issn: 0968-3445 in [[Ebsco]] </ref> | Very much sobered in the later years of his reign, and much concerned over the precariousness of Germany's position because of the weakness of the [[Triple Alliance]] (Germany, Austria, Italy) and the growing strength of the opposition Triple [[Entente]] (Britain, France, Russia), he abandoned his former methods. The question as to his guilt for World War I, which was written into the [[Treaty of Versailles]], became a subject of bitter debate after the war. | ||
[[Image:Kaiser1918.jpg|thumb|350px|Hindenburg (left), the Kaiser and Ludendorff (right) examine aerial photographs of enemy positions, 1918]] | |||
During the war he repeatedly tried to interfere with the work of the German general staff, until the General Staff learned how to sideline him with endless briefings. His power was then limited to the appointment and dismissal of key personnel. His importance in the decision-making process was less a matter of his input into the decisions themselves than the people he appointed to make them. Ultimately, he acted as an "umpire," coordinating strategic planning between politicians and the military. The fact that he could delay or prevent policy measures through his veto power led people to anticipate his wishes and avoid decisions likely to meet with his disapproval.<ref>Holger Afflerbach, "Wilhelm II as Supreme Warlord in the First World War." ''War in History'' 1998 5(4): 427-449. Issn: 0968-3445 in [[Ebsco]] </ref> | |||
==Abdication== | ==Abdication== | ||
Revision as of 03:47, 13 May 2008
William II or Wilhelm II (1859-1941) , German Emperor ("Kaiser") and King of Prussia. Taking power in 1888, he dismissed Chancellor, Prince Otto von Bismarck in 1890 and launched Germany on a bellicose "New Course" in foreign affairs, culminating in his support for Austria in the crisis of summer 1914 that caused World War I. Bombastic and impetuous, he blundered often, making major diplomatic decisions on his own, and making military decisions with his generals and admirals, ignoring the civilian government. An ineffective war leader, he lost the support of the army, abdicated in November 1918, and fled to exile in the Netherlands.
Life
William, the eldest son of Emperor Frederick III and Victoria, the Princess Royal, daughter of Queen Victoria, was born Jan. 27, 1859. He was related to many royal figures across Europe, and as war loomed in 1914 was the cousin of, and on a first-name basis with both the czar of Russia and the king of Britain.[1] William suffered from birth with a crippled arm. He attended the gymnasium of Cassel, served in the army, and studied law at the University of Bonn. On the death of his father, William succeeded to the throne, in June 1888. He entered upon the life and activities of the sovereign with such enthusiasm that he was soon in conflict with the Chancellor, Prince Otto von Bismarck, whom he forced to resign in 1890. Selecting chancellors more ready to follow his lead, the young emperor struck out on what is called the "New Course" (Neue Kurs) in Germany's policy, which soon lost it the friendship of Russia and, ultimately, Britain. The Kaiser, in a most tactless manner, refused to renew the Russian reinsurance treaty, which Bismarck considered extremely important, so that, entirely isolated, Russia turned to France and entered into the alliance which became the basis for the Triple Entente.
Monarch
For thirty years William was the most prominent monarch of Europe. Thoroughly committed to his royal prerogative, he took an active part in every phase of the life of his time, whenever his fancy dictated, and, being unusually versatile and imaginative, often with real distinction. At times, however, he was led into serious mistakes. Major blunders included the Kruger telegram (1896, congratulating Boer rebels fighting Britain), the saber-rattling 1908 Daily Telegraph interview that angered and alarmed the British,[2] the brutal instructions to his brother Henry on the departure of the punitive expedition to China, his quarrel with Britain's Prince of Wales, his reckless support of a tottering Austria-Hungary in the crises of 1908, 1912, and 1914). Each blunder seriously damaged Germany's prestige and led to the tightening of the alliances against it. He was often used by his officials and allowed to take the blame in case of failure. The emperor's irrationality and instability were further aggravated by the generic weaknesses in the constitutional and political system in Germany, and alarmed leaders across Europe as Germany grew in industrial and military strength.
As a counter to the army, he used the Geheime Feldpolizei (secret field police), which had been created after a failed attempt on Bismarck's life in 1866. Headed by Wilhelm Stieber It protected the monarch, censored the German press (which was perceived as a potential political threat), and supplied him information independently of the army general staff.
Promoter of arts and science
William was an enthusiastic promoter of the the arts and sciences, education, social welfare. He sponsored the Kaiser Wilhelm Society, for the promotion of scientific research; it was funded by wealthy donors and the state and comprised a number of research institutes in both pure and applied sciences. The Prussian Academy of Sciences was unable to avoid the Kaiser's pressure and lost some of its autonomy when forced to redefine its attitude toward engineering and award three new fellowships in engineering sciences as a gift from the Kaiser in 1900.[3]
William supported the modernizers as they tried to reform the Prussian system of secondary education, which was rigidly traditional, elitist, politically authoritarian, and unchanged by the progress in the natural sciences.
Above all he supported the rapid growth of the army and the navy, sponsoring the Navy League, and on repeated occasions he announced to the world that Germany's future lay on the sea. On the other hand senior naval officers were aghast at his participation in 1912 naval maneuvers. William's bumbling interference and caustic commentary revealed his insensitive, immature, and ignorant character.
Race
William more than anyone warned Europe in the 1890s of the "yellow peril", whereby hordes of Chinese would take over the globe and ruin western civilization. Few Europeans paid attention. In 1905 William said that the future would see a fight to the finish for the survival of either the "White" or "Yellow" nations and urged all white peoples to unite in the struggle. Expanding the empire into Africa and the Pacific, William supported brutal policies. In South-West Africa, the Germans exterminated up to 80% of the Hereros tribe, and were almost as devastating in German East Africa.
World War
Very much sobered in the later years of his reign, and much concerned over the precariousness of Germany's position because of the weakness of the Triple Alliance (Germany, Austria, Italy) and the growing strength of the opposition Triple Entente (Britain, France, Russia), he abandoned his former methods. The question as to his guilt for World War I, which was written into the Treaty of Versailles, became a subject of bitter debate after the war.
During the war he repeatedly tried to interfere with the work of the German general staff, until the General Staff learned how to sideline him with endless briefings. His power was then limited to the appointment and dismissal of key personnel. His importance in the decision-making process was less a matter of his input into the decisions themselves than the people he appointed to make them. Ultimately, he acted as an "umpire," coordinating strategic planning between politicians and the military. The fact that he could delay or prevent policy measures through his veto power led people to anticipate his wishes and avoid decisions likely to meet with his disapproval.[4]
Abdication
Upon the outbreak of the revolution in Germany, following the defeat of the German armies on the Western Front, he was practically dethroned by his Chancellor before he could abdicate, Nov. 9, 1918. With his fall, the entire monarchical and aristocratic system of Germany, Prussia, Bavaria and other states collapsed overnight. He fled to the Netherlands with hours to spare before his arrest by the new German government. There he lived in retirement in the village of Doorn. Prime Minister David Lloyd George won the British general election of December 1918 with the help of the slogan "Hang the Kaiser," but the Netherlands refused extradition. President Woodrow Wilson argued that punishing William for waging war would destabilize international order and lose the peace.[5] William died at Doorn on June 4, 1941.
Bibliography
- Clark, Christopher M. Kaiser Wilhelm II. (2000) 271 pp. short essay by scholar
- Clay, Catrine. King Kaiser Tsar: Three Royal Cousins Who Led the World to War. (2007). 432 pp. popular narrative
- Klahr, Douglas Mark. "The Kaiser Builds Berlin: Expressing National and Dynastic Identity in the Early Building Projects of Wilhelm II." PhD dissertation Brown U. 2002. 356 pp. DAI 2002 63(4): 1157-A. DA3050916 Fulltext: ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
- MacDonogh, Giles. The Last Kaiser: The Life of Wilhelm II. (2001). 416 pp. popular excerpt and text search
- Mommsen, Wolfgang J. "Kaiser Wilhelm II and German Politics." Journal of Contemporary History 1990 25(2-3): 289-316. Issn: 0022-0094 in Jstor
- Röhl, John C. G. Young Wilhelm: The Kaiser's Early Life, 1859-1888. (1998). 979 pp.; vol 2: Wilhelm II: The Kaiser's Personal Monarchy, 1888-1900. (2004). 1287 pp.; massive scholarly study
- Röhl, John C. G. The Kaiser and his Court: Wilhelm II and the Government of Germany (1996) 287pp excerpt and text search
- Röhl, John C. G., and Nicolaus Sombart, eds. Kaiser Wilhelm II: New Interpretations (1982), 319 pp.
- Waite, Robert G. L. Kaiser and Führer: A Comparative Study of Personality and Politics. (1998). 511 pp. Psychohistory that compares him with Adolf Hitler
See also
notes
- ↑ He often worked with and tried to bully his royal relatives. Roderick R. McLean, "Kaiser Wilhelm Ii and the British Royal Family: Anglo-German Dynastic Relations in Political Context, 1890-1914." History 2001 86(284): 478-502. Issn: 0018-2648 in Ebsco
- ↑ Thomas G. Otte, "'An Altogether Unfortunate Affair': Great Britain and the Daily Telegraph Affair." Diplomacy & Statecraft 1994 5(2): 296-333. Issn: 0959-2296
- ↑ Wolfgang König, "The Academy and the Engineering Sciences: an Unwelcome Royal Gift." Minerva: a Review of Science, Learning and Policy 2004 42(4): 359-377. Issn: 0026-4695 Fulltext: Ebsco
- ↑ Holger Afflerbach, "Wilhelm II as Supreme Warlord in the First World War." War in History 1998 5(4): 427-449. Issn: 0968-3445 in Ebsco
- ↑ Nigel J. Ashton, and Duco Hellema, "Hanging the Kaiser: Anglo-dutch Relations and the Fate of Wilhelm II, 1918-20". Diplomacy & Statecraft 2000 11(2): 53-78. Issn: 0959-2296 in Ebsco