User:Howard C. Berkowitz/EC/QM: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen m (Howard C. Berkowitz/EC/QM moved to User:Howard C. Berkowitz/EC/QM: lost in namespace) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{AccountNotLive}} | |||
'''Quality marking''' is the set of procedures associated with Charter Article 22, which states, "Articles formally judged to be of high quality by editors shall be designated "approved", protected and kept permanently available." Realistically, there is a continuum between the start of an article and its full approval, and even revisions of approved articles. | '''Quality marking''' is the set of procedures associated with Charter Article 22, which states, "Articles formally judged to be of high quality by editors shall be designated "approved", protected and kept permanently available." Realistically, there is a continuum between the start of an article and its full approval, and even revisions of approved articles. | ||
Latest revision as of 02:57, 22 November 2023
The account of this former contributor was not re-activated after the server upgrade of March 2022.
Quality marking is the set of procedures associated with Charter Article 22, which states, "Articles formally judged to be of high quality by editors shall be designated "approved", protected and kept permanently available." Realistically, there is a continuum between the start of an article and its full approval, and even revisions of approved articles.