CZ:Introduction to CZ for Wikipedians: Difference between revisions
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Larry Sanger |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Behavior == | == Behavior == | ||
Behave in a professional manner; we actually take our [[CZ:Professionalism|Professionalism]] policy seriously. This means, among other things, that personal attacks are not allowed here. Such attacks may be replaced with our <nowiki>{{civil}}</nowiki> template, which reads | Behave in a professional manner; we actually take our [[CZ:Professionalism|Professionalism]] policy seriously. This means, among other things, that personal attacks are not allowed here. Such attacks may not only be replaced with our <nowiki>{{civil}}</nowiki> template, which reads, | ||
:{{civil}} | :{{civil}} | ||
they may also result in a warning or even a ban, depending on the case. | |||
Moreover, if you have any complaints to make about other users, no matter how well justified, please don't make them on the wiki. They will (or should, anyway) be removed by constables and replaced with the <nowiki>{{nocomplaints}}</nowiki> template, which reads: | Moreover, if you have any complaints to make about other users, no matter how well justified, please don't make them on the wiki. They will (or should, anyway) be removed by constables and replaced with the <nowiki>{{nocomplaints}}</nowiki> template, which reads: | ||
| Line 13: | Line 15: | ||
:{{nocomplaints}} | :{{nocomplaints}} | ||
The procedure is to write to the Constabulary at constables@citizendium.org and let them take care of the problem. To take others to task on the wiki is aggressive behavior--"taking the law into your own hands"--and such unpleasantness is the burden of the Constabulary. | |||
Wikipedia has a three-revert rule--we don't. We have a no-unexplained-revert rule--justify any reversion on the talk page. Reverting, or simply undoing someone else's work, is a very upsetting behavior to other people, and understandably so. So it definitely requires explanation. But we simply ''will not'' have edit warring here. If you disagree with another participant, the first step is to discuss the matter on the talk page; if no satisfactory compromise can be reached, the next step is to ask an editor in the relevant area and with the relevant expertise to adjudicate. Eventually, we'll have a more sophisticated dispute resolution process, but so far we haven't needed one, simply because we've been pretty good at actually collaborating and compromising. | Wikipedia has a three-revert rule--we don't. We have a no-unexplained-revert rule--justify any reversion on the talk page. Reverting, or simply undoing someone else's work, is a very upsetting behavior to other people, and understandably so. So it definitely requires explanation. But we simply ''will not'' have edit warring here. If you disagree with another participant, the first step is to discuss the matter on the talk page; if no satisfactory compromise can be reached, the next step is to ask an editor in the relevant area and with the relevant expertise to adjudicate. Eventually, we'll have a more sophisticated dispute resolution process, but so far we haven't needed one, simply because we've been pretty good at actually collaborating and compromising. | ||
---- | |||
Notice that we aren't putting contributor-oriented templates, such as Wikipedia's [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutrality_templates neutrality templates,] atop our articles. | |||
Revision as of 10:46, 30 March 2007
Welcome, Wikipedians and ex-Wikipedians!
This page will introduce some "dos and don'ts" of the Citizendium that Wikipedians in particular may have to bear in mind. You should also read about the really big differences between the Citizendium and Wikipedia, and also about how to convert Wikipedia articles to Citizendium articles.
Behavior
Behave in a professional manner; we actually take our Professionalism policy seriously. This means, among other things, that personal attacks are not allowed here. Such attacks may not only be replaced with our {{civil}} template, which reads,
Text here was removed by the Constabulary on grounds of civility. (The author may replace this template with an edited version of the original remarks.)
they may also result in a warning or even a ban, depending on the case.
Moreover, if you have any complaints to make about other users, no matter how well justified, please don't make them on the wiki. They will (or should, anyway) be removed by constables and replaced with the {{nocomplaints}} template, which reads:
A comment here was deleted by The Constabulary on grounds of making complaints about fellow Citizens. If you have a complaint about the behavior of another Citizen, e-mail [email protected]. It is contrary to Citizendium policy to air your complaints on the wiki. See also CZ:Professionalism.
The procedure is to write to the Constabulary at [email protected] and let them take care of the problem. To take others to task on the wiki is aggressive behavior--"taking the law into your own hands"--and such unpleasantness is the burden of the Constabulary.
Wikipedia has a three-revert rule--we don't. We have a no-unexplained-revert rule--justify any reversion on the talk page. Reverting, or simply undoing someone else's work, is a very upsetting behavior to other people, and understandably so. So it definitely requires explanation. But we simply will not have edit warring here. If you disagree with another participant, the first step is to discuss the matter on the talk page; if no satisfactory compromise can be reached, the next step is to ask an editor in the relevant area and with the relevant expertise to adjudicate. Eventually, we'll have a more sophisticated dispute resolution process, but so far we haven't needed one, simply because we've been pretty good at actually collaborating and compromising.
Notice that we aren't putting contributor-oriented templates, such as Wikipedia's neutrality templates, atop our articles.