User:Anthony.Sebastian/Proposal to recruit academics/Talk page: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Russell D. Jones
(Some thoughts)
imported>John Stephenson
m (rm categories)
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>{{subpages}}</noinclude>
<!-- Please ignore (but don't delete) any formatting that you are not familiar with. Others will probably chime in to help you set things up. -->


Welcoming comments on [[User:Anthony.Sebastian/Proposal to recruit academics]]:
Welcoming comments on [[User:Anthony.Sebastian/Proposal to recruit academics]]:
Line 15: Line 13:
<br>
<br>
<hr><br>
<hr><br>
<!--Please ignore the following lines if you are not familiar with the usage of subpages at Citizendium.-->
[[Category:CZ Live]]
[[Category:Articles without metadata]]
[[Category:Stub Articles]]
[[Category:Needs Workgroup]]
[[Category:Editable user pages]]

Revision as of 06:41, 18 September 2020

Welcoming comments on User:Anthony.Sebastian/Proposal to recruit academics:

re: 'Until approved they will be labeled as "preprints", or "article in progress."'

We already have something called "Draft" pages. Could not this work? Russell D. Jones (talk) 23:46, 11 May 2016 (UTC)


re: random thoughts while reading it:

Some of this proposal seems like it would act as an individual's blog "my comments on recent scholarship, book reviews, thoughts on the implications of theory x, etc." Also, you bring up at the end, thoughts about "work [being] freely distributed/reproduced with the proviso that it cannot be altered." I think this conflicts with the CC-by-nc 3.0 CC licence we've adopted. I don't think you're proposing to change copyright licence, are you? Russell D. Jones (talk) 23:46, 11 May 2016 (UTC)