User:Ragnar Schroder/Sandbox: Difference between revisions
imported>Ragnar Schroder |
imported>Ragnar Schroder |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
Given a Galois group G we may look for chains <math>G = H_0 \sub H_1 \sub H_2 \ldots \sub H_n = S_1 </math> such that <math> H_1 </math> is a normal subgroup in <math> H_0 </math>, <math> H_2 </math> is a normal subgroup in <math> H_1 </math>, etc. | Given a Galois group G we may look for chains <math>G = H_0 \sub H_1 \sub H_2 \ldots \sub H_n = S_1 </math> such that <math> H_1 </math> is a normal subgroup in <math> H_0 </math>, <math> H_2 </math> is a normal subgroup in <math> H_1 </math>, etc. | ||
The collection of all these chains may be represented by a [[graph theory|directed graph]], with the various subgroups as nodes and the relation | The collection of all these chains may be represented by a [[graph theory|directed graph]], with the various subgroups as nodes and the relation <math> B \sub A </math> represented by a directed edge from A to B. | ||
Similary, given the collection of intermediate fields, we may look for chains <math>K = M_n \sub M_{n-1} \sub M_{n-2} \ldots \sub M_0 = L </math> of fields such that for all <math> i > 0 , M_i </math> is a normal field extension [[Galois theory glossary|(glossary)]] of <math> M_{i-1} </math>. | Similary, given the collection of intermediate fields, we may look for chains <math>K = M_n \sub M_{n-1} \sub M_{n-2} \ldots \sub M_0 = L </math> of fields such that for all <math> i > 0 , M_i </math> is a normal field extension [[Galois theory glossary|(glossary)]] of <math> M_{i-1} </math>. | ||
The collection of all these chains may be represented by a directed graph as well, with the various fields as nodes and the relation | The collection of all these chains may be represented by a directed graph as well, with the various fields as nodes and the relation <math> B \sub A </math> represented by a directed edge from A to B. | ||
The Galois correspondence is an isomorphism between the two graphs. | |||
Revision as of 03:44, 20 December 2007
Testing my sandbox:
1995: 0,28 grader
1997: 0,36 grader
1998: 0,52 grader
2001: 0,40 grader 2002: 0,46 grader 2003: 0,46 grader 2004: 0,43 grader 2005: 0,48 grader 2006: 0,42 grader 2007: 0,41 grader
ÆØÅ æøå
The Galois connection
Given a Galois group G we may look for chains such that is a normal subgroup in , is a normal subgroup in , etc.
The collection of all these chains may be represented by a directed graph, with the various subgroups as nodes and the relation represented by a directed edge from A to B.
Similary, given the collection of intermediate fields, we may look for chains of fields such that for all is a normal field extension (glossary) of .
The collection of all these chains may be represented by a directed graph as well, with the various fields as nodes and the relation represented by a directed edge from A to B.
The Galois correspondence is an isomorphism between the two graphs.
Given a Galois group G we may look for chains such that is a normal subgroup in , is a normal subgroup in , etc.
Also, given the collection of intermediate fields, one may look for chains of fields such that for all is a normal field extension (glossary) of .
The Galois connection is a bijective function f from all subgroups in G participating in any chain of normal subgroups to all intermediate fields participating in any chain of normal field extensions.
Given any such chain, the Galois correspondence is a function f from the set to the set
The Galois correspondence is a function f from any such element in any such chain such that
The Galois correspondence asserts that for each such chain of normal subgroups, there exists a corresponding chain of fields such that for all is a normal field extension (glossary) of .
The Galois correspondence asserts that for each subgroup in , there exist a corresponding fields such that
Given a field L that extends K, , the field extension and
If L is a splitting field for some polynomial with coefficients over K, then L:K is a normal and finite field extension.
If
The Galois group of a polynomial - a basic example
As an example, let us look at the second-degree polynomial , with the coefficients {-5,0,1} viewed as elements of Q.
This polynomial has no roots in Q. However, from the fundamental theorem of algebra we know that it has exacly two roots in C, and can be written as the product of two first-degree polynomials there - i.e. . From direct inspection of the polynomial we also realize that .
L = is the smallest subfield of C that contains Q and both and .
The are exactly 2 automorphisms of L that leave every element of Q alone: the do-nothing automorphism and the map .
Under composition of automorphisms, these two automorphisms together form a group isomorphic to , the group of permutations of two objects.
The sought for Galois group is therefore , which has no nontrivial subgroups.
The 3 requirements (explained below) for the Galois correspondence to exist happen to be fullfilled, so we we conclude from the subgroup structure of that there is no intermediate field extension containing Q and also roots of the polynomial.