CZ Talk:Technical Team

My idea for this was much more narrowly tailored. But what do you have in mind, RWK? Stephen Ewen 18:21, 24 December 2007 (CST)

Um, I just copied the bio workgroup page for a template (because I don't think we have a generic workgroup template page!), and I'm modifying it greatly.

Oh, gosh, looks great now. :-) Stephen Ewen 21:03, 24 December 2007 (CST)

Do I detect sarcasm. =\. --Robert W King 21:12, 24 December 2007 (CST)

No, its much better. Stephen Ewen 15:41, 26 December 2007 (CST)

Well, it's either going to be "Technical Workgroup" or "Technical Team" (the name you gave it is redundant) and if you're interested in participating in such a team, by golly, you should communicate with the actual team: send mail to [email protected].

I wouldn't call it a "workgroup." It wouldn't be responsible for content, so it's not anything like the existing workgroups. --Larry Sanger 13:52, 27 December 2007 (CST)

Well, whatever it will be called, it at least has a face! In the current state (as Stephen said somewhere) you basically have to be "in the know". --Robert W King 13:57, 27 December 2007 (CST)

Hmmm. The thesaurus is pretty useless on this one. But I guess it would be over technical content, like the pages for CZ:Templates, CZ:Extensions, and that sort of thing. Stephen Ewen 15:26, 27 December 2007 (CST)

But how about we just avoid this debate and just be content with "Technical Team". Whatever we call it, it'll still do the same thing! Stephen Ewen 16:09, 27 December 2007 (CST)

What is this?

Technical team... does it have members? What do they do? Can anyone join, like the other workgroups? (I see it's not called a workgroup anymore...) Can suggestions for technical modifications etc be made here? What is it??? Caesar Schinas 17:48, 10 May 2009 (UTC)